Skip to main content

Ormond vs Wurdiboluc

Property investment comparison - Ormond, VIC 3204 vs Wurdiboluc, VIC 3241

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ormond wins 3, Wurdiboluc wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOrmondWurdiboluc
Median house price$1.8M$1.9M
Median unit price$720K$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.59%1.63%
Gross rental yield (units)4.06%3.23%
1-year house growth-5.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%0.6%
Population8,328147

Ormond vs Wurdiboluc: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Ormond and $1.9M in Wurdiboluc, so Ormond is the cheaper entry point, with Wurdiboluc houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ormond sits at a median of $720K against $715K in Wurdiboluc, which makes Wurdiboluc the more affordable unit market and Ormond the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ormond leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.59%, compared with 1.63% in Wurdiboluc, a gap of 0.96 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Wurdiboluc and 1.9% in Ormond, so landlords in Wurdiboluc face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ormond is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,328 against 147, roughly 57 times the size of Wurdiboluc; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ormond for rental income, Ormond for a lower purchase price, Wurdiboluc for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison