Osborne Park vs Yangebup
Property investment comparison - Osborne Park, WA 6017 vs Yangebup, WA 6164
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Osborne Park wins 1, Yangebup wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Osborne Park | Yangebup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $995K | $990K |
| Median unit price | - | $685K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.60% | 5.01% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +23.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +73.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Population | 4,463 | 7,631 |
Osborne Park vs Yangebup: what the numbers say
The median house price is $995K in Osborne Park and $990K in Yangebup, so Yangebup is the cheaper entry point, with Osborne Park houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Yangebup and 0.4% in Osborne Park, so landlords in Yangebup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Yangebup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,631 against 4,463, larger than Osborne Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yangebup for a lower purchase price, Yangebup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison