Skip to main content

Ottoway vs Salisbury Park

Property investment comparison - Ottoway, SA 5013 vs Salisbury Park, SA 5109

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ottoway wins 2, Salisbury Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOttowaySalisbury Park
Median house price$795K$800K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.60%
1-year house growth+8.2%estimate+13.1%
3-year house growth-+58.3%
Vacancy rate0.2%0.4%
Population2,7832,276

Ottoway vs Salisbury Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $795K in Ottoway and $800K in Salisbury Park, so Ottoway is the cheaper entry point, with Salisbury Park houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Ottoway (an estimate) and +13.1% in Salisbury Park, so recent momentum favours Salisbury Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Ottoway and 0.4% in Salisbury Park, so landlords in Ottoway face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ottoway is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,783 against 2,276, larger than Salisbury Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ottoway for a lower purchase price, Salisbury Park for recent price momentum, Ottoway for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison