Skip to main content

Oxenford vs Rifle Range

Property investment comparison - Oxenford, QLD 4210 vs Rifle Range, QLD 4311

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Oxenford wins 2, Rifle Range wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOxenfordRifle Range
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.73%
Gross rental yield (units)4.67%-
1-year house growth+14.4%+16.0%
3-year house growth+48.4%+61.6%
Vacancy rate1.7%8.5%
Population12,273197

Oxenford vs Rifle Range: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Oxenford and $1.2M in Rifle Range, so Oxenford is the cheaper entry point, with Rifle Range houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.4% in Oxenford and +16.0% in Rifle Range, so recent momentum favours Rifle Range, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Oxenford houses are +48.4% and Rifle Range houses +61.6%, so Rifle Range has compounded faster than Oxenford over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Oxenford and 8.5% in Rifle Range, so landlords in Oxenford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oxenford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,273 against 197, roughly 62 times the size of Rifle Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oxenford for a lower purchase price, Rifle Range for recent price momentum, Oxenford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison