Skip to main content

Pacific Heights vs Regents Park

Property investment comparison - Pacific Heights, QLD 4703 vs Regents Park, QLD 4118

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pacific Heights wins 0, Regents Park wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPacific HeightsRegents Park
Median house price$950K$945K
Median unit price$1.1M-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.79%4.27%
1-year house growth+11.1%+15.5%
3-year house growth+29.3%+45.7%
Vacancy rate4.4%2.4%
Population1,11111,103

Pacific Heights vs Regents Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $950K in Pacific Heights and $945K in Regents Park, so Regents Park is the cheaper entry point, with Pacific Heights houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Pacific Heights and +15.5% in Regents Park, so recent momentum favours Regents Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Pacific Heights houses are +29.3% and Regents Park houses +45.7%, so Regents Park has compounded faster than Pacific Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Regents Park and 4.4% in Pacific Heights, so landlords in Regents Park face less competition for tenants.

Regents Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,103 against 1,111, roughly 10 times the size of Pacific Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Regents Park for a lower purchase price, Regents Park for recent price momentum, Regents Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison