Skip to main content

Para Hills vs Salisbury Park

Property investment comparison - Para Hills, SA 5096 vs Salisbury Park, SA 5109

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Para Hills wins 2, Salisbury Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPara HillsSalisbury Park
Median house price$810K$800K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.09%4.60%
1-year house growth+13.9%+13.1%
3-year house growth+46.4%+58.3%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.4%
Population6,7932,276

Para Hills vs Salisbury Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $810K in Para Hills and $800K in Salisbury Park, so Salisbury Park is the cheaper entry point, with Para Hills houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Para Hills and +13.1% in Salisbury Park, so recent momentum favours Para Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Para Hills houses are +46.4% and Salisbury Park houses +58.3%, so Salisbury Park has compounded faster than Para Hills over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Salisbury Park and 0.8% in Para Hills, so landlords in Salisbury Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Para Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,793 against 2,276, roughly 3.0 times the size of Salisbury Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Salisbury Park for a lower purchase price, Para Hills for recent price momentum, Salisbury Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison