Skip to main content

Parkes vs Yenda

Property investment comparison - Parkes, NSW 2870 vs Yenda, NSW 2681

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Parkes wins 3, Yenda wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricParkesYenda
Median house price$480K$490K
Median unit price-$355K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.80%4.67%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.08%
1-year house growth+7.0%+2.7%estimate
3-year house growth-2.8%-
Vacancy rate2.7%2.0%
Population11,3241,564

Parkes vs Yenda: what the numbers say

The median house price is $480K in Parkes and $490K in Yenda, so Parkes is the cheaper entry point, with Yenda houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Parkes leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 4.67% in Yenda, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.0% in Parkes and +2.7% in Yenda (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Parkes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Yenda and 2.7% in Parkes, so landlords in Yenda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,324 against 1,564, roughly 7 times the size of Yenda; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Parkes for rental income, Parkes for a lower purchase price, Parkes for recent price momentum, Yenda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison