Parkville vs Ravenhall
Property investment comparison - Parkville, VIC 3052 vs Ravenhall, VIC 3023
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Parkville wins 4, Ravenhall wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Parkville | Ravenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | $1.8M |
| Median unit price | $470K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | 1.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.33% | 3.22% |
| 1-year house growth | -2.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -28.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| Population | 7,074 | 2,295 |
Parkville vs Ravenhall: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.8M in Parkville and $1.8M in Ravenhall, so Parkville is the cheaper entry point, with Ravenhall houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Parkville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 1.66% in Ravenhall, a gap of 1.44 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Parkville and 1.1% in Ravenhall, so landlords in Parkville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Parkville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,074 against 2,295, roughly 3.1 times the size of Ravenhall; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Parkville for rental income, Parkville for a lower purchase price, Parkville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison