Skip to main content

Parma vs The Hill

Property investment comparison - Parma, NSW 2540 vs The Hill, NSW 2300

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Parma wins 3, The Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricParmaThe Hill
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$625K$780K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.48%2.17%
Gross rental yield (units)4.64%4.11%
1-year house growth-+6.7%
3-year house growth-+5.6%
Vacancy rate2.3%1.9%
Population1672,076

Parma vs The Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Parma and $2.1M in The Hill, so Parma is the cheaper entry point, with The Hill houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Parma sits at a median of $625K against $780K in The Hill, which makes Parma the more affordable unit market and The Hill the pricier one.

On cash flow, The Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.17%, compared with 1.48% in Parma, a gap of 0.69 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in The Hill and 2.3% in Parma, so landlords in The Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

The Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,076 against 167, roughly 12 times the size of Parma; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: The Hill for rental income, Parma for a lower purchase price, The Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison