Skip to main content

Paterson vs Wyongah

Property investment comparison - Paterson, NSW 2421 vs Wyongah, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Paterson wins 1, Wyongah wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPatersonWyongah
Median house price$950K$945K
Median unit price$465K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.56%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)3.78%4.46%
1-year house growth-2.7%+14.5%estimate
3-year house growth+10.7%-
Vacancy rate1.6%2.5%
Population9602,020

Paterson vs Wyongah: what the numbers say

The median house price is $950K in Paterson and $945K in Wyongah, so Wyongah is the cheaper entry point, with Paterson houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Wyongah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 3.56% in Paterson, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.7% in Paterson and +14.5% in Wyongah (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wyongah, while Paterson went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Paterson and 2.5% in Wyongah, so landlords in Paterson face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wyongah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,020 against 960, roughly 2.1 times the size of Paterson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wyongah for rental income, Wyongah for a lower purchase price, Wyongah for recent price momentum, Paterson for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison