Skip to main content

Patyah vs Rushworth

Property investment comparison - Patyah, VIC 3318 vs Rushworth, VIC 3612

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Patyah wins 2, Rushworth wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPatyahRushworth
Median house price$365K$370K
Median unit price$375K$310K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.86%5.33%
Gross rental yield (units)3.01%3.09%
1-year house growth-+5.8%
3-year house growth--8.0%
Vacancy rate0.5%1.8%
Population581,411

Patyah vs Rushworth: what the numbers say

The median house price is $365K in Patyah and $370K in Rushworth, so Patyah is the cheaper entry point, with Rushworth houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Patyah sits at a median of $375K against $310K in Rushworth, which makes Rushworth the more affordable unit market and Patyah the pricier one.

On cash flow, Rushworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.33%, compared with 4.86% in Patyah, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Patyah and 1.8% in Rushworth, so landlords in Patyah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rushworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,411 against 58, roughly 24 times the size of Patyah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rushworth for rental income, Patyah for a lower purchase price, Patyah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison