Skip to main content

Patyah vs Wedderburn

Property investment comparison - Patyah, VIC 3318 vs Wedderburn, VIC 3518

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Patyah wins 3, Wedderburn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPatyahWedderburn
Median house price$365K$350K
Median unit price$375K$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.86%4.98%
Gross rental yield (units)3.01%2.25%
1-year house growth-+23.1%
3-year house growth-+16.7%
Vacancy rate0.5%3.3%
Population58951

Patyah vs Wedderburn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $365K in Patyah and $350K in Wedderburn, so Wedderburn is the cheaper entry point, with Patyah houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Patyah sits at a median of $375K against $395K in Wedderburn, which makes Patyah the more affordable unit market and Wedderburn the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wedderburn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.98%, compared with 4.86% in Patyah, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Patyah and 3.3% in Wedderburn, so landlords in Patyah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wedderburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 951 against 58, roughly 16 times the size of Patyah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wedderburn for rental income, Wedderburn for a lower purchase price, Patyah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison