Skip to main content

Pegs Creek vs Usher

Property investment comparison - Pegs Creek, WA 6714 vs Usher, WA 6230

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pegs Creek wins 1, Usher wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPegs CreekUsher
Median house price$650K$640K
Median unit price$555K$370K
Gross rental yield (houses)-5.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-7.87%
1-year house growth+21.1%estimate+15.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%0.7%
Population2,0502,137

Pegs Creek vs Usher: what the numbers say

The median house price is $650K in Pegs Creek and $640K in Usher, so Usher is the cheaper entry point, with Pegs Creek houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Pegs Creek sits at a median of $555K against $370K in Usher, which makes Usher the more affordable unit market and Pegs Creek the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.1% in Pegs Creek (an estimate) and +15.6% in Usher (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Pegs Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Usher and 1.6% in Pegs Creek, so landlords in Usher face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Usher is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,137 against 2,050, larger than Pegs Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Usher for a lower purchase price, Pegs Creek for recent price momentum, Usher for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison