Skip to main content

Pelaw Main vs Sussex Inlet

Property investment comparison - Pelaw Main, NSW 2327 vs Sussex Inlet, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pelaw Main wins 3, Sussex Inlet wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPelaw MainSussex Inlet
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price-$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.47%3.83%
Gross rental yield (units)4.48%4.10%
1-year house growth+15.3%estimate+2.7%
3-year house growth-+6.6%
Vacancy rate0.6%3.1%
Population1,0803,888

Pelaw Main vs Sussex Inlet: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Pelaw Main and $780K in Sussex Inlet.

On cash flow, Sussex Inlet leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.83%, compared with 3.47% in Pelaw Main, a gap of 0.36 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.3% in Pelaw Main (an estimate) and +2.7% in Sussex Inlet, so recent momentum favours Pelaw Main, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Pelaw Main and 3.1% in Sussex Inlet, so landlords in Pelaw Main face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sussex Inlet is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,888 against 1,080, roughly 3.6 times the size of Pelaw Main; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sussex Inlet for rental income, Pelaw Main for recent price momentum, Pelaw Main for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison