Skip to main content

Peregian Springs vs Wamuran

Property investment comparison - Peregian Springs, QLD 4573 vs Wamuran, QLD 4512

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Peregian Springs wins 1, Wamuran wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPeregian SpringsWamuran
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$1.0M$845K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.14%3.18%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+14.4%estimate+18.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%1.4%
Population9,5323,374

Peregian Springs vs Wamuran: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Peregian Springs and $1.5M in Wamuran, so Wamuran is the cheaper entry point, with Peregian Springs houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Peregian Springs sits at a median of $1.0M against $845K in Wamuran, which makes Wamuran the more affordable unit market and Peregian Springs the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.14% in Peregian Springs and 3.18% in Wamuran, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.4% in Peregian Springs (an estimate) and +18.6% in Wamuran (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wamuran, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.3%.

Peregian Springs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,532 against 3,374, roughly 2.8 times the size of Wamuran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wamuran for a lower purchase price, Wamuran for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison