Skip to main content

Picketts Valley vs Woolooware

Property investment comparison - Picketts Valley, NSW 2251 vs Woolooware, NSW 2230

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Picketts Valley wins 2, Woolooware wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPicketts ValleyWoolooware
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$835K$995K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%3.92%
1-year house growth-+6.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%2.4%
Population2215,060

Picketts Valley vs Woolooware: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Picketts Valley and $2.6M in Woolooware, so Woolooware is the cheaper entry point, with Picketts Valley houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Picketts Valley sits at a median of $835K against $995K in Woolooware, which makes Picketts Valley the more affordable unit market and Woolooware the pricier one.

On cash flow, Woolooware leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.46% in Picketts Valley, a gap of 0.64 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Picketts Valley and 2.4% in Woolooware, so landlords in Picketts Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woolooware is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,060 against 221, roughly 23 times the size of Picketts Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woolooware for rental income, Woolooware for a lower purchase price, Picketts Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Picketts Valley vs Woolooware: Suburb Comparison 2026