Skip to main content

Pitt Town vs Rydalmere

Property investment comparison - Pitt Town, NSW 2756 vs Rydalmere, NSW 2116

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pitt Town wins 1, Rydalmere wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPitt TownRydalmere
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$760K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.52%4.93%
1-year house growth+8.3%+3.8%estimate
3-year house growth+3.8%-
Vacancy rate3.8%1.0%
Population3,8717,274

Pitt Town vs Rydalmere: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Pitt Town and $1.9M in Rydalmere.

For units, Pitt Town sits at a median of $760K against $725K in Rydalmere, which makes Rydalmere the more affordable unit market and Pitt Town the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.3% in Pitt Town and +3.8% in Rydalmere (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Pitt Town, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Rydalmere and 3.8% in Pitt Town, so landlords in Rydalmere face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rydalmere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,274 against 3,871, larger than Pitt Town; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pitt Town for recent price momentum, Rydalmere for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison