Skip to main content

Pitt Town vs Wrights Beach

Property investment comparison - Pitt Town, NSW 2756 vs Wrights Beach, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pitt Town wins 2, Wrights Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPitt TownWrights Beach
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$760K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%1.74%
Gross rental yield (units)4.52%4.49%
1-year house growth+8.3%-
3-year house growth+3.8%-
Vacancy rate3.8%3.3%
Population3,871137

Pitt Town vs Wrights Beach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Pitt Town and $1.9M in Wrights Beach.

For units, Pitt Town sits at a median of $760K against $625K in Wrights Beach, which makes Wrights Beach the more affordable unit market and Pitt Town the pricier one.

On cash flow, Pitt Town leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 1.74% in Wrights Beach, a gap of 0.72 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 3.3% in Wrights Beach and 3.8% in Pitt Town, so landlords in Wrights Beach face less competition for tenants.

Pitt Town is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,871 against 137, roughly 28 times the size of Wrights Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pitt Town for rental income, Wrights Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison