Skip to main content

Point Vernon vs Trinity Park

Property investment comparison - Point Vernon, QLD 4655 vs Trinity Park, QLD 4879

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Point Vernon wins 1, Trinity Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPoint VernonTrinity Park
Median house price$815K$815K
Median unit price$555K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.33%
1-year house growth+14.4%+13.2%estimate
3-year house growth+37.4%-
Vacancy rate2.9%1.3%
Population5,7183,536

Point Vernon vs Trinity Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $815K in Point Vernon and $815K in Trinity Park.

On cash flow, Trinity Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 4.00% in Point Vernon, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.4% in Point Vernon and +13.2% in Trinity Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Point Vernon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Trinity Park and 2.9% in Point Vernon, so landlords in Trinity Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Point Vernon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,718 against 3,536, larger than Trinity Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Trinity Park for rental income, Point Vernon for recent price momentum, Trinity Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison