Skip to main content

Pokolbin vs Revesby

Property investment comparison - Pokolbin, NSW 2320 vs Revesby, NSW 2212

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pokolbin wins 2, Revesby wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPokolbinRevesby
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$345K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.40%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)9.07%-
1-year house growth+7.9%estimate+3.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.1%1.3%
Population1,04915,268

Pokolbin vs Revesby: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.6M in Pokolbin and $1.6M in Revesby.

For units, Pokolbin sits at a median of $345K against $1.1M in Revesby, which makes Pokolbin the more affordable unit market and Revesby the pricier one.

On cash flow, Revesby leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 2.40% in Pokolbin, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Pokolbin (an estimate) and +3.6% in Revesby (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Pokolbin, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Revesby and 2.1% in Pokolbin, so landlords in Revesby face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Revesby is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,268 against 1,049, roughly 15 times the size of Pokolbin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Revesby for rental income, Pokolbin for recent price momentum, Revesby for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison