Police Point vs Trevallyn
Property investment comparison - Police Point, TAS 7116 vs Trevallyn, TAS 7250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Police Point wins 1, Trevallyn wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Police Point | Trevallyn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $710K | $700K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.84% | 4.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.65% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 2.5% |
| Population | 76 | 4,826 |
Police Point vs Trevallyn: what the numbers say
The median house price is $710K in Police Point and $700K in Trevallyn, so Trevallyn is the cheaper entry point, with Police Point houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Trevallyn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.23%, compared with 3.84% in Police Point, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Police Point and 2.5% in Trevallyn, so landlords in Police Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Trevallyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,826 against 76, roughly 64 times the size of Police Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Trevallyn for rental income, Trevallyn for a lower purchase price, Police Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison