Skip to main content

Pomeroy vs Quakers Hill

Property investment comparison - Pomeroy, NSW 2580 vs Quakers Hill, NSW 2763

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pomeroy wins 2, Quakers Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPomeroyQuakers Hill
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$560K$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.14%2.63%
Gross rental yield (units)4.03%-
1-year house growth-+7.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate5.9%1.8%
Population9427,893

Pomeroy vs Quakers Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Pomeroy and $1.4M in Quakers Hill, so Pomeroy is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Pomeroy sits at a median of $560K against $900K in Quakers Hill, which makes Pomeroy the more affordable unit market and Quakers Hill the pricier one.

On cash flow, Quakers Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.63%, compared with 2.14% in Pomeroy, a gap of 0.49 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Quakers Hill and 5.9% in Pomeroy, so landlords in Quakers Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Quakers Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 27,893 against 94, roughly 297 times the size of Pomeroy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Quakers Hill for rental income, Pomeroy for a lower purchase price, Quakers Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison