Port Fairy vs Tarwin
Property investment comparison - Port Fairy, VIC 3284 vs Tarwin, VIC 3956
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Port Fairy wins 2, Tarwin wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Port Fairy | Tarwin |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | $855K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.27% | 2.59% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.97% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +11.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -5.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 2.0% |
| Population | 3,742 | 59 |
Port Fairy vs Tarwin: what the numbers say
The median house price is $860K in Port Fairy and $855K in Tarwin, so Tarwin is the cheaper entry point, with Port Fairy houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Port Fairy leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.27%, compared with 2.59% in Tarwin, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Port Fairy and 2.0% in Tarwin, so landlords in Port Fairy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Port Fairy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,742 against 59, roughly 63 times the size of Tarwin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Port Fairy for rental income, Tarwin for a lower purchase price, Port Fairy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison