Skip to main content

Portarlington vs Tootgarook

Property investment comparison - Portarlington, VIC 3222 vs Tootgarook, VIC 3941

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Portarlington wins 2, Tootgarook wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPortarlingtonTootgarook
Median house price$890K$885K
Median unit price$760K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%3.44%
Gross rental yield (units)2.90%4.80%
1-year house growth--0.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.6%1.5%
Population4,4363,178

Portarlington vs Tootgarook: what the numbers say

The median house price is $890K in Portarlington and $885K in Tootgarook, so Tootgarook is the cheaper entry point, with Portarlington houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Portarlington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.44% in Tootgarook, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Portarlington and 1.5% in Tootgarook, so landlords in Portarlington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Portarlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,436 against 3,178, larger than Tootgarook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Portarlington for rental income, Tootgarook for a lower purchase price, Portarlington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison