Skip to main content

Portarlington vs Tarrington

Property investment comparison - Portarlington, VIC 3223 vs Tarrington, VIC 3301

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Portarlington wins 2, Tarrington wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPortarlingtonTarrington
Median house price$825K$820K
Median unit price$630K$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%2.00%
Gross rental yield (units)3.80%6.04%
1-year house growth+3.6%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.1%12.4%
Population4,436328

Portarlington vs Tarrington: what the numbers say

The median house price is $825K in Portarlington and $820K in Tarrington, so Tarrington is the cheaper entry point, with Portarlington houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Portarlington sits at a median of $630K against $395K in Tarrington, which makes Tarrington the more affordable unit market and Portarlington the pricier one.

On cash flow, Portarlington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 2.00% in Tarrington, a gap of 1.50 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Portarlington and 12.4% in Tarrington, so landlords in Portarlington face less competition for tenants.

Portarlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,436 against 328, roughly 14 times the size of Tarrington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Portarlington for rental income, Tarrington for a lower purchase price, Portarlington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison