Skip to main content

Purnim vs Seddon

Property investment comparison - Purnim, VIC 3278 vs Seddon, VIC 3011

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Purnim wins 3, Seddon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPurnimSeddon
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$440K$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.92%3.45%
Gross rental yield (units)5.33%-
1-year house growth+20.1%-1.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate7.1%1.6%
Population2925,143

Purnim vs Seddon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Purnim and $1.1M in Seddon, so Purnim is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Purnim sits at a median of $440K against $715K in Seddon, which makes Purnim the more affordable unit market and Seddon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Seddon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.45%, compared with 1.92% in Purnim, a gap of 1.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.1% in Purnim and -1.7% in Seddon (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Purnim, while Seddon went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Seddon and 7.1% in Purnim, so landlords in Seddon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Seddon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,143 against 292, roughly 18 times the size of Purnim; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seddon for rental income, Purnim for a lower purchase price, Purnim for recent price momentum, Seddon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison