Putney vs Warrawee
Property investment comparison - Putney, NSW 2112 vs Warrawee, NSW 2074
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Putney wins 0, Warrawee wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Putney | Warrawee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.5M | $3.5M |
| Median unit price | - | $935K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.74% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -6.1%estimate | -5.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.0% | 2.0% |
| Population | 4,097 | 3,170 |
Putney vs Warrawee: what the numbers say
The median house price is $3.5M in Putney and $3.5M in Warrawee, so Warrawee is the cheaper entry point, with Putney houses about 1% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved -6.1% in Putney (an estimate) and -5.2% in Warrawee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Warrawee, while Putney went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Warrawee and 3.0% in Putney, so landlords in Warrawee face less competition for tenants.
Putney is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,097 against 3,170, larger than Warrawee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warrawee for a lower purchase price, Warrawee for recent price momentum, Warrawee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison