Skip to main content

Queens Park vs Singleton

Property investment comparison - Queens Park, WA 6107 vs Singleton, WA 6175

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Queens Park wins 2, Singleton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricQueens ParkSingleton
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price$640K$550K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.75%
1-year house growth+22.8%+20.3%estimate
3-year house growth+75.4%-
Vacancy rate1.0%2.0%
Population7,2684,021

Queens Park vs Singleton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Queens Park and $920K in Singleton.

For units, Queens Park sits at a median of $640K against $550K in Singleton, which makes Singleton the more affordable unit market and Queens Park the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.8% in Queens Park and +20.3% in Singleton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Queens Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Queens Park and 2.0% in Singleton, so landlords in Queens Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Queens Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,268 against 4,021, larger than Singleton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Queens Park for recent price momentum, Queens Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison