Skip to main content

Queenscliff vs Spotswood

Property investment comparison - Queenscliff, VIC 3225 vs Spotswood, VIC 3015

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Queenscliff wins 2, Spotswood wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricQueenscliffSpotswood
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$740K$765K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.29%
Gross rental yield (units)3.77%-
1-year house growth-9.7%estimate-6.1%
3-year house growth-+4.1%
Vacancy rate1.7%3.6%
Population1,5162,820

Queenscliff vs Spotswood: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Queenscliff and $1.1M in Spotswood.

For units, Queenscliff sits at a median of $740K against $765K in Spotswood, which makes Queenscliff the more affordable unit market and Spotswood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -9.7% in Queenscliff (an estimate) and -6.1% in Spotswood, so recent momentum favours Spotswood, while Queenscliff went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Queenscliff and 3.6% in Spotswood, so landlords in Queenscliff face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Spotswood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,820 against 1,516, larger than Queenscliff; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Spotswood for recent price momentum, Queenscliff for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison