Skip to main content

Quindalup vs Waterford

Property investment comparison - Quindalup, WA 6281 vs Waterford, WA 6152

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Quindalup wins 2, Waterford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricQuindalupWaterford
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$1.7M-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.08%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.81%3.87%
1-year house growth+18.7%estimate+16.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%4.0%
Population1,4882,460

Quindalup vs Waterford: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Quindalup and $2.0M in Waterford, so Waterford is the cheaper entry point, with Quindalup houses about 3% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.7% in Quindalup (an estimate) and +16.8% in Waterford (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Quindalup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Quindalup and 4.0% in Waterford, so landlords in Quindalup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waterford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,460 against 1,488, larger than Quindalup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waterford for a lower purchase price, Quindalup for recent price momentum, Quindalup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Quindalup vs Waterford: Suburb Comparison 2026