Skip to main content

Quindalup vs Wembley

Property investment comparison - Quindalup, WA 6281 vs Wembley, WA 6014

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Quindalup wins 1, Wembley wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricQuindalupWembley
Median house price$2.0M$1.9M
Median unit price$1.7M$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.08%2.80%
Gross rental yield (units)2.81%5.75%
1-year house growth+18.7%estimate+9.8%
3-year house growth-+37.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.9%
Population1,48812,061

Quindalup vs Wembley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Quindalup and $1.9M in Wembley, so Wembley is the cheaper entry point, with Quindalup houses about 5% dearer.

For units, Quindalup sits at a median of $1.7M against $555K in Wembley, which makes Wembley the more affordable unit market and Quindalup the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wembley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.80%, compared with 2.08% in Quindalup, a gap of 0.72 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.7% in Quindalup (an estimate) and +9.8% in Wembley, so recent momentum favours Quindalup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.

Wembley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,061 against 1,488, roughly 8 times the size of Quindalup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wembley for rental income, Wembley for a lower purchase price, Quindalup for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison