Skip to main content

Quinns Rocks vs Tapping

Property investment comparison - Quinns Rocks, WA 6030 vs Tapping, WA 6065

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Quinns Rocks wins 2, Tapping wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricQuinns RocksTapping
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%4.17%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%3.42%
1-year house growth+16.2%+20.6%
3-year house growth+61.8%+69.1%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.8%
Population8,8619,547

Quinns Rocks vs Tapping: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Quinns Rocks and $1.0M in Tapping.

On cash flow, Tapping leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.17%, compared with 3.80% in Quinns Rocks, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.2% in Quinns Rocks and +20.6% in Tapping, so recent momentum favours Tapping, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Quinns Rocks houses are +61.8% and Tapping houses +69.1%, so Tapping has compounded faster than Quinns Rocks over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Quinns Rocks and 1.8% in Tapping, so landlords in Quinns Rocks face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tapping is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,547 against 8,861, larger than Quinns Rocks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tapping for rental income, Tapping for recent price momentum, Quinns Rocks for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison