Qunaba vs Woree
Property investment comparison - Qunaba, QLD 4670 vs Woree, QLD 4868
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Qunaba wins 0, Woree wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Qunaba | Woree |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $710K | $710K |
| Median unit price | $605K | $345K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.67% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.1% | +17.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +34.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 6.0% | 0.3% |
| Population | 836 | 5,127 |
Qunaba vs Woree: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $710K in Qunaba and $710K in Woree.
For units, Qunaba sits at a median of $605K against $345K in Woree, which makes Woree the more affordable unit market and Qunaba the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.1% in Qunaba and +17.6% in Woree (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woree, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Woree and 6.0% in Qunaba, so landlords in Woree face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Woree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,127 against 836, roughly 6 times the size of Qunaba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Woree for recent price momentum, Woree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison