Skip to main content

Ranelagh vs Rosetta

Property investment comparison - Ranelagh, TAS 7109 vs Rosetta, TAS 7010

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ranelagh wins 1, Rosetta wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRanelaghRosetta
Median house price$730K$725K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.61%4.53%
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%4.96%
1-year house growth+7.6%estimate+16.8%
3-year house growth-+6.2%
Vacancy rate1.4%2.6%
Population1,4842,833

Ranelagh vs Rosetta: what the numbers say

The median house price is $730K in Ranelagh and $725K in Rosetta, so Rosetta is the cheaper entry point, with Ranelagh houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Rosetta leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.53%, compared with 3.61% in Ranelagh, a gap of 0.92 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Ranelagh (an estimate) and +16.8% in Rosetta, so recent momentum favours Rosetta, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Ranelagh and 2.6% in Rosetta, so landlords in Ranelagh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rosetta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,833 against 1,484, larger than Ranelagh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rosetta for rental income, Rosetta for a lower purchase price, Rosetta for recent price momentum, Ranelagh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison