Skip to main content

Rangeville vs Westbrook

Property investment comparison - Rangeville, QLD 4350 vs Westbrook, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rangeville wins 3, Westbrook wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRangevilleWestbrook
Median house price$940K$940K
Median unit price$665K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.48%
Gross rental yield (units)4.18%3.60%
1-year house growth+19.5%+11.5%
3-year house growth+50.6%+37.2%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population8,6684,408

Rangeville vs Westbrook: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $940K in Rangeville and $940K in Westbrook.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.5% in Rangeville and +11.5% in Westbrook, so recent momentum favours Rangeville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Rangeville houses are +50.6% and Westbrook houses +37.2%, so Rangeville has compounded faster than Westbrook over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Westbrook and 1.3% in Rangeville, so landlords in Westbrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rangeville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,668 against 4,408, larger than Westbrook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rangeville for recent price momentum, Westbrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison