Skip to main content

Ravenswood vs Scottsdale

Property investment comparison - Ravenswood, TAS 7250 vs Scottsdale, TAS 7260

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ravenswood wins 3, Scottsdale wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRavenswoodScottsdale
Median house price$470K$475K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)5.00%5.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.07%
1-year house growth+20.2%estimate+8.3%
3-year house growth-+20.1%
Vacancy rate0.5%1.2%
Population3,8042,408

Ravenswood vs Scottsdale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $470K in Ravenswood and $475K in Scottsdale, so Ravenswood is the cheaper entry point, with Scottsdale houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 5.00% in Ravenswood and 5.00% in Scottsdale, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Ravenswood (an estimate) and +8.3% in Scottsdale, so recent momentum favours Ravenswood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Ravenswood and 1.2% in Scottsdale, so landlords in Ravenswood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ravenswood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,804 against 2,408, larger than Scottsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ravenswood for a lower purchase price, Ravenswood for recent price momentum, Ravenswood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison