Skip to main content

Ravenswood vs Warnbro

Property investment comparison - Ravenswood, WA 6208 vs Warnbro, WA 6169

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ravenswood wins 1, Warnbro wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRavenswoodWarnbro
Median house price$805K$800K
Median unit price-$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)2.55%-
1-year house growth+22.4%+19.7%estimate
3-year house growth+77.0%-
Vacancy rate2.4%1.1%
Population2,48310,828

Ravenswood vs Warnbro: what the numbers say

The median house price is $805K in Ravenswood and $800K in Warnbro, so Warnbro is the cheaper entry point, with Ravenswood houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.10% in Ravenswood and 4.10% in Warnbro, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.4% in Ravenswood and +19.7% in Warnbro (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ravenswood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Warnbro and 2.4% in Ravenswood, so landlords in Warnbro face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warnbro is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,828 against 2,483, roughly 4.4 times the size of Ravenswood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warnbro for a lower purchase price, Ravenswood for recent price momentum, Warnbro for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison