Red Lion vs Seymour
Property investment comparison - Red Lion, VIC 3371 vs Seymour, VIC 3660
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Red Lion wins 0, Seymour wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Red Lion | Seymour |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $460K | $460K |
| Median unit price | $425K | $295K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.05% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 6.52% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -3.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 0.8% |
| Population | 111 | 6,569 |
Red Lion vs Seymour: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $460K in Red Lion and $460K in Seymour.
For units, Red Lion sits at a median of $425K against $295K in Seymour, which makes Seymour the more affordable unit market and Red Lion the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Seymour and 2.8% in Red Lion, so landlords in Seymour face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Seymour is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,569 against 111, roughly 59 times the size of Red Lion; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seymour for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison