Redan vs Sutton Grange
Property investment comparison - Redan, VIC 3350 vs Sutton Grange, VIC 3448
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Redan wins 0, Sutton Grange wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Redan | Sutton Grange |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $510K | $510K |
| Median unit price | $380K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 6.62% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +5.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 3,000 | 160 |
Redan vs Sutton Grange: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $510K in Redan and $510K in Sutton Grange.
On cash flow, Sutton Grange leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.62%, compared with 4.10% in Redan, a gap of 2.52 percentage points.
Redan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,000 against 160, roughly 19 times the size of Sutton Grange; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Sutton Grange for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison