Skip to main content

Redan vs Timboon

Property investment comparison - Redan, VIC 3350 vs Timboon, VIC 3268

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Redan wins 4, Timboon wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRedanTimboon
Median house price$510K$515K
Median unit price$380K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)-2.27%
1-year house growth+16.4%+5.7%
3-year house growth+5.2%+5.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%2.9%
Population3,0001,250

Redan vs Timboon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $510K in Redan and $515K in Timboon, so Redan is the cheaper entry point, with Timboon houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Redan sits at a median of $380K against $670K in Timboon, which makes Redan the more affordable unit market and Timboon the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.4% in Redan and +5.7% in Timboon, so recent momentum favours Redan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Redan houses are +5.2% and Timboon houses +5.5%, so Timboon has compounded faster than Redan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Redan and 2.9% in Timboon, so landlords in Redan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Redan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,000 against 1,250, roughly 2.4 times the size of Timboon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Redan for a lower purchase price, Redan for recent price momentum, Redan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison