Redan vs Wee Wee Rup
Property investment comparison - Redan, VIC 3350 vs Wee Wee Rup, VIC 3568
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Redan wins 2, Wee Wee Rup wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Redan | Wee Wee Rup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $510K | $510K |
| Median unit price | $380K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 4.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +5.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 2.9% |
| Population | 3,000 | 31 |
Redan vs Wee Wee Rup: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $510K in Redan and $510K in Wee Wee Rup.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.10% in Redan and 4.08% in Wee Wee Rup, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Redan and 2.9% in Wee Wee Rup, so landlords in Redan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Redan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,000 against 31, roughly 97 times the size of Wee Wee Rup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Redan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison