Skip to main content

Redridge vs Southside

Property investment comparison - Redridge, QLD 4660 vs Southside, QLD 4570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Redridge wins 3, Southside wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRedridgeSouthside
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price$405K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.08%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)6.60%-
1-year house growth+15.6%+13.8%
3-year house growth+44.1%+34.5%
Vacancy rate3.4%1.4%
Population7116,312

Redridge vs Southside: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Redridge and $800K in Southside.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.08% in Redridge and 4.05% in Southside, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.6% in Redridge and +13.8% in Southside, so recent momentum favours Redridge, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Redridge houses are +44.1% and Southside houses +34.5%, so Redridge has compounded faster than Southside over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Southside and 3.4% in Redridge, so landlords in Southside face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Southside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,312 against 711, roughly 9 times the size of Redridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Redridge for recent price momentum, Southside for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison