Skip to main content

Redridge vs Wyreema

Property investment comparison - Redridge, QLD 4660 vs Wyreema, QLD 4352

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Redridge wins 3, Wyreema wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRedridgeWyreema
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price$405K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.08%4.06%
Gross rental yield (units)6.60%1.40%
1-year house growth+15.6%-
3-year house growth+44.1%+62.8%
Vacancy rate3.4%0.6%
Population7112,076

Redridge vs Wyreema: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Redridge and $800K in Wyreema.

For units, Redridge sits at a median of $405K against $1.3M in Wyreema, which makes Redridge the more affordable unit market and Wyreema the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.08% in Redridge and 4.06% in Wyreema, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Looking back three years, Redridge houses are +44.1% and Wyreema houses +62.8%, so Wyreema has compounded faster than Redridge over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Wyreema and 3.4% in Redridge, so landlords in Wyreema face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wyreema is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,076 against 711, roughly 2.9 times the size of Redridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wyreema for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison