Reedy Flat vs Whittington
Property investment comparison - Reedy Flat, VIC 3895 vs Whittington, VIC 3219
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Reedy Flat wins 0, Whittington wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Reedy Flat | Whittington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $590K | $590K |
| Median unit price | - | $430K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.71% | 4.25% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.02% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +18.0% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.2% |
| Population | 6 | 3,990 |
Reedy Flat vs Whittington: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $590K in Reedy Flat and $590K in Whittington.
On cash flow, Whittington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.25%, compared with 2.71% in Reedy Flat, a gap of 1.54 percentage points.
Whittington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,990 against 6, roughly 665 times the size of Reedy Flat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Whittington for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison