Skip to main content

Rockville vs Woree

Property investment comparison - Rockville, QLD 4350 vs Woree, QLD 4868

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rockville wins 1, Woree wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRockvilleWoree
Median house price$715K$710K
Median unit price$615K$345K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.70%-
1-year house growth+19.9%+17.6%estimate
3-year house growth+65.8%-
Vacancy rate1.0%0.3%
Population3,2045,127

Rockville vs Woree: what the numbers say

The median house price is $715K in Rockville and $710K in Woree, so Woree is the cheaper entry point, with Rockville houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Rockville sits at a median of $615K against $345K in Woree, which makes Woree the more affordable unit market and Rockville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.9% in Rockville and +17.6% in Woree (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Rockville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Woree and 1.0% in Rockville, so landlords in Woree face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,127 against 3,204, larger than Rockville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woree for a lower purchase price, Rockville for recent price momentum, Woree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison