Skip to main content

Rosanna vs Yannathan

Property investment comparison - Rosanna, VIC 3084 vs Yannathan, VIC 3981

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rosanna wins 2, Yannathan wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRosannaYannathan
Median house price$1.4M$1.5M
Median unit price$815K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.40%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)3.98%-
1-year house growth-2.8%-
3-year house growth+11.7%-
Vacancy rate1.6%0.6%
Population8,616272

Rosanna vs Yannathan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Rosanna and $1.5M in Yannathan, so Rosanna is the cheaper entry point, with Yannathan houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Rosanna sits at a median of $815K against $1.2M in Yannathan, which makes Rosanna the more affordable unit market and Yannathan the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yannathan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.70%, compared with 2.40% in Rosanna, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Yannathan and 1.6% in Rosanna, so landlords in Yannathan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rosanna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,616 against 272, roughly 32 times the size of Yannathan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yannathan for rental income, Rosanna for a lower purchase price, Yannathan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison