Skip to main content

Rosehill vs Thirroul

Property investment comparison - Rosehill, NSW 2142 vs Thirroul, NSW 2515

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rosehill wins 2, Thirroul wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRosehillThirroul
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$530K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)5.80%-
1-year house growth+1.5%+4.5%
3-year house growth+13.2%+8.3%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.6%
Population4,0476,348

Rosehill vs Thirroul: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Rosehill and $1.9M in Thirroul, so Thirroul is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Rosehill sits at a median of $530K against $1.2M in Thirroul, which makes Rosehill the more affordable unit market and Thirroul the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.5% in Rosehill and +4.5% in Thirroul, so recent momentum favours Thirroul, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Rosehill houses are +13.2% and Thirroul houses +8.3%, so Rosehill has compounded faster than Thirroul over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Thirroul and 1.9% in Rosehill, so landlords in Thirroul face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Thirroul is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,348 against 4,047, larger than Rosehill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thirroul for a lower purchase price, Thirroul for recent price momentum, Thirroul for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison