Skip to main content

Rowville vs Yarraville

Property investment comparison - Rowville, VIC 3178 vs Yarraville, VIC 3013

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rowville wins 3, Yarraville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRowvilleYarraville
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$760K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.51%5.12%
1-year house growth+8.0%+0.8%
3-year house growth+9.5%+9.1%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.7%
Population33,57115,636

Rowville vs Yarraville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Rowville and $1.2M in Yarraville, so Rowville is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Rowville sits at a median of $760K against $620K in Yarraville, which makes Yarraville the more affordable unit market and Rowville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Rowville and +0.8% in Yarraville, so recent momentum favours Rowville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Rowville houses are +9.5% and Yarraville houses +9.1%, so Rowville has compounded faster than Yarraville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Yarraville and 1.6% in Rowville, so landlords in Yarraville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rowville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 33,571 against 15,636, roughly 2.1 times the size of Yarraville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rowville for a lower purchase price, Rowville for recent price momentum, Yarraville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison