Rushworth vs Wombelano
Property investment comparison - Rushworth, VIC 3612 vs Wombelano, VIC 3409
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rushworth wins 1, Wombelano wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Rushworth | Wombelano |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $370K | $380K |
| Median unit price | $310K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.33% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.09% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -8.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Population | 1,411 | 49 |
Rushworth vs Wombelano: what the numbers say
The median house price is $370K in Rushworth and $380K in Wombelano, so Rushworth is the cheaper entry point, with Wombelano houses about 3% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Wombelano and 1.8% in Rushworth, so landlords in Wombelano face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Rushworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,411 against 49, roughly 29 times the size of Wombelano; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rushworth for a lower purchase price, Wombelano for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison