Skip to main content

Rydalmere vs St Huberts Island

Property investment comparison - Rydalmere, NSW 2116 vs St Huberts Island, NSW 2257

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rydalmere wins 3, St Huberts Island wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRydalmereSt Huberts Island
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$725K$870K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.24%
Gross rental yield (units)4.93%3.79%
1-year house growth+3.8%estimate+7.3%
3-year house growth-+22.3%
Vacancy rate1.0%6.5%
Population7,2741,080

Rydalmere vs St Huberts Island: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Rydalmere and $1.9M in St Huberts Island.

For units, Rydalmere sits at a median of $725K against $870K in St Huberts Island, which makes Rydalmere the more affordable unit market and St Huberts Island the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.8% in Rydalmere (an estimate) and +7.3% in St Huberts Island, so recent momentum favours St Huberts Island, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Rydalmere and 6.5% in St Huberts Island, so landlords in Rydalmere face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rydalmere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,274 against 1,080, roughly 7 times the size of St Huberts Island; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: St Huberts Island for recent price momentum, Rydalmere for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Rydalmere vs St Huberts Island: Suburb Comparison 2026